- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
| Digg | Slashdot | Fark | Stumble | |
| MIXX | del.icio.us | Newsvine | Technorati | |
The venerable mouse, created by Internet pioneer Doug Engelbart, has been unchallenged since the dawn of modern computing. But rapidly maturing touch and speech technologies are threatening to dethrone the mouse as the dominant computer input device.
Looking ahead five years, as the idea of a computer changes from a box under your desk to a device on your car dashboard, or on the bathroom mirror, or in your pocket, the mouse will become less important – maybe even a distant memory.
These new touch and talk technologies are already making an impact. For example, CNN uses a touch display to present information;
Intel used one to showcase its new processors at the recent CES show. Ford uses speech recognition in its cars, and FedEx operates
its phone lines with a computer voice — with a distinctive chime that most of us recognize immediately.
Apple's iPhone sparked the touch-screen revolution. Since the iPhone debut, companies such as HP and Dell have decided to bring that easy finger control to the desktop. And companies such as Nuance and TellMe are taking advantage of improved computing power and better statistical models to make speech technologies more viable than
ever before.
"The magic is in grasping the human objectives of an interface and combining the best technologies simultaneously to address those objectives," says Don Richards, the creative director at Foghorn Creative, the company that designed the Intel touch wall at CES.
Of course, nobody is predicting that the mouse will totally disappear. Tests based on Fitt's Law of human-computer interaction
have proven that the mouse is the optimal pointing device. Engineers and programmers will continue to use them.
Yet, these new products demonstrate how touch and speech technology have gone from an interesting idea to legitimate technologies.
Here are some examples.
* HP Touchsmart IQ816
The HP Touchsmart really is smart. There's a separate touch interface that runs on top of Windows. You can flick through photos, download an egg-timer app that helps you whip up dinner, or play chess with your fingers. The model I tested is a 25-inch monster with an Intel Core 2 Duo processor, so it runs fast enough for games and Photoshop editing.
Yet, it's the potential of this machine that has me hooked. The Touchsmartcommuinity.org showcases some interesting apps, including one where you can interact with YouTube.com videos. HP is committed to make this touch platform work. One example: you can sync the Touch calendar to your Google Calendar.
* Palm Pre
Another touch device worth noting is the Palm Pre, which could be the ultimate savior of Palm. The new WebOS will replace PalmOS entirely, relying on touch control instead of a stylus. The main benefit: smartphone users prefer touch because it means operating a phone with one hand, interacting in a more physical way with the screen, and browsing through media faster. During a hands-on test, it became obvious that Palm is serious about touch: the screen responds quickly to any input, such as flicking a photo or ending a call. (Competing models from Samsung and HTC rely on haptics technology for a slight buzzing sensation, confirming each click.)
* Asus EEE T91
Like HP, Asus is set to take the world of touch to a whole new level. They are introducing the Eee Top desktop model this year and a convertible notebook PC called the T91. The resistive screen does not support multi-touch, which requires a capacitive screen. But Asus deserves extra credit for the Linux operating system, which offers a painting program, a touch browser, and a nifty circular interface that you can flick through with a finger. The most impressive feature: a table-top interface for browsing photos where you can spread out images, ala the Microsoft Surface table.
* Dell Latitude XT2
With technology provided by N-Trig, the Dell Latitude XT2 is the very latest — and most advanced — touch computer on the market. (HP also just released the Touchsmart TX2, but we were not able to test it out quite yet.) The capacitive touch screen supports two-fingered gestures, such as clicking down on the screen and rotating a photo at the same time. Browsing the Web is amazingly easy: you can just flick up and down through text, mimicking the readability and easy control of the Amazon Kindle reader. The real kicker: the XT2 may be the only touch-enabled device that should work with Windows 7 out-of-the-box when it ships later this year.
Speech recognition was a buzzword, then it was a misnomer – now it's just another technology. Speech recognition expert Bill Meisel, president of TMA Associates, says the first companies to offer speech recognition promised too much and delivered too little. Today, it is all about the statistical models. With each new year, companies like TellMe and Nuance accumulate more data to learn speech patterns and dialect. Most critically, speech systems have now proven their worth by limiting voice commands to just a few terms and slowly expanding.
"The more people talk to computers, the more data speech technology companies have to create the models, and the more parameters they can use in these models," Meisel says.
Here are some examples:
* Microsoft Sync 3
The next version of Microsoft Sync, which will be available in Ford vehicles later this year, will use a new voice called Samantha that sounds less computer generated. TellMe, the Microsoft-owned subsidiary, is also working on new mapping features to make Sync work like a GPS. And, a Bluetooth phone connection could mean tapping into the Internet for voice search. Most importantly, the company uses an entire data center to analyze voice commands. In a road test, the "recognizer" was highly accurate. TellMe has learned a few lessons about speech: they power the 1-800 services for FedEX and many others.
* GraceNote CarStars
Imagine driving in a car on a country road. You lean back, wind in your hair, and suddenly get the urge to play an old U2 song. Instead of fumbling with a satellite radio station or pulling out a scratched up CD, the GraceNote CarStars system actually lets you speak to your stereo. In a hands-on demo, I was able to play songs by speaking the name, and listen to the actual artist make suggestions. GraceNote is still working on the product, but the idea is that if you're a fan of U2, then Bono would be the one who talks you through music options.
* Garmin Nuvi 855T
It makes sense that a GPS device would support speech recognition – it means focusing on the road and typing with your fingers less. The Garmin Nuvi 855T is easily one of the most advanced speech-recognition devices available for your car. You can speak any term shown on the screen, use your voice to search for local business names, and find other points of interest. There's still an occasional glitch: when looking for a new address, I decided to go "back" but the speech analyzer kept thinking I meant Bakken Street. Fortunately, the GPS usually repeats back what you say, so there's also a back-door to start over or just try saying things a different way.
* Nuance Dragon Naturally Speaking 10
Speaking to a computer still feels a bit awkward, especially if anyone else is around. Yet, as more people interact with a PC this way, it could become more natural. Nuance has accumulated a vast 'speech vocabulary' over the past several years and does a much better job of detecting words. Processing power – especially on dual and quad-core processors – also helps. There's still a cumbersome training process that takes a good 30 minutes, but Dragon software is getting there. In dictating a page of text, the program only typed a few minor errors. Sounds-like words are still an issue – the clothier Herbergers sounds too much like hamburgers to a computer.
Heralded as the first Google Android-powered phone, G1 has revealed itself as a proving ground for innovative apps. The mapping applets – which let you swipe on the screen to pan around local city streets – is worth the price of the phone alone.
Just in the past few weeks, two key speech applications show how your voice can be a far better input device than a finger or stylus, especially if you're driving in traffic. TeleNav GPS Navigator for Android supports speech input for finding a location. You just click a button such as intersection or business name, then click another button to say the term, such as "bakeries" or "bank". You just hold down the green talk button, since the service just uses your phone microphone. With the Android 1.1 update for G1, there's also a new voice search app where you speak a term and see the results at Google.com. I tested at least 20 addresses and search terms and the G1 understood the meaning almost every time. I thought, why type an address ever again?
Touch and speech technology are not the only ideas that could replace the standard desktop mouse. For example, Microsoft is set to announce a new "touchless" technology where you motion to the screen to control the interface, skipping a touch display and speech input altogether.
Logitech MX Air Mouse
Although this device has been out for a while, it's packed with several features that make it ideal for living room control of a PC across the room. For one, it supports gestures such as a side-to-side movement to control volume, and has an accelerometer (similar to the iPhone) that senses when the device is at rest or ready to start tracking mouse movement. Best of all, Logitech skipped a complex calibration set-up process – the Air mouse actually learns on the fly.
Hitachi wave remote
Here's another alternative input concept. At CES, Hitachi showed off a "wave remote" technology that you can use with family room HDTV. There's no handheld device at all, and no display to touch. Instead, to change a channel or turn up the volume, you just move your hands. For example, to bring up the interface, you wave at the screen. The technology uses IR sensors and a 3D tracking camera that would be built in to the television, scanning your movements in the same way the Apple iPhone accelerometer senses movement when you turn it to the side.
Brandon is a freelance writer in Minnesota. He can be reached at jbrandonbb@gmail.com.
Receive the latest news, reviews and trends on your favorite technology topics
The Mouse Will Never DieBy Anonymous on May 4, 2009, 9:48 amIt's still the most convenient pointing device for stationary applications. And a wireless mouse adds flexibility and ease-of-use. If I can use a mouse, I will. If not, I think the touchpad or touchscreen are reasonable alternatives. Voice, however - no way.
CoolBy samantha11 on November 11, 2009, 4:48 amGood one! free online games adventure games racing games escape games
dddBy Anonymous on October 15, 2009, 9:59 pm Read this article, replica watches replica watch omega watches Isee a lot of things Constellation Watches, Cheap Omega Replica Watches For Sale Constellation Watches, Cheap Omega Replica Watches For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C093 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C073 Replica Cheap For Sale Constellation Watches, Cheap Omega Replica Watches For Sale
ssssBy Anonymous on October 15, 2009, 9:19 pm By seeing this article, replica watches replica watch omega watches I understand a lot, learned a lot of knowledge Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C079 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C077 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C081 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C059 Replica Cheap For Sale
ssssBy Anonymous on October 15, 2009, 9:19 pm By seeing this article, replica watches replica watch omega watches I understand a lot, learned a lot of knowledge Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C079 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C077 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C081 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C059 Replica Cheap For Sale
ssssBy Anonymous on October 15, 2009, 9:18 pm By seeing this article, replica watches replica watch omega watches I understand a lot, learned a lot of knowledge Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C079 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C077 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C081 Replica Cheap For Sale Omega Constellation Woman's Watch-C059 Replica Cheap For Sale
And blind and mobility impaired users will access these touch scBy Anonymous on May 26, 2009, 9:58 pmOh, that's right, they won't be able to. Voice recognition is getting better, yes, but it only works if you can speak. Honestly, I don't have any physical impairment except for being short, and my bank now makes me this Procrustean stretch out my car window to use their drive-up ATMs' touch screens *and for no apparent reason.*
Slide 5By Anonymous on May 18, 2009, 9:12 amThe touch screen responds to two-fingered gestures... At last a computer that can take a hint
RE the recently announced deathBy Anonymous on May 8, 2009, 2:55 pmThe mouse is dead, See Mark Twain
Price?By jkohut on May 8, 2009, 10:39 amI think a big impediment to the death of the mouse will be cost. Touchscreen devices are expensive compared with non-touch screen displays, mice are cheap and get the job done. Going to be hard to overcome that for some people. As price comes down (and technology and features go up), it may be that the number of mice sold with systems does go down. That doesn't mean that people may not connect up an old mouse (since optical ones don't really wear out too badly anymore) to perform some functions (comment about aching shoulders probably has some validity to it).
The mouse will remain prevalentBy Anonymous on May 8, 2009, 7:10 amAfter using various pointing devices (tuchscreen, trackpads, trackballs, IBM's thinkpad red gizmo, joysticks) I find nothing beats a good qualitiy mouse for real work involving moving quickly around the screen and fine granularity in selection. Even the best trackpads are at best, a 'second best', since they tend to interrupt the workflow a lot more. USB virtually wiped out RS232, but you don't manipulate those interfaces constantly to do 'real work', and USB, though flawed, is significantly better on most counts. Flat panels provide tangible advantages, but in real life I still see a screen in front of me. Tricked out keyboards have never caught on, and they would have to pry my mouse from my cold, dead hand.
DeconBy Anonymous on May 6, 2009, 5:11 pmWho wants fingerprints on their monitor? Voice recog would be irritating in a cubicle environment. Can you imagine everyone talking to their computers simultaneously? It reminds me of Dilbert's Wally being jealous of Dilbert's voice rec S/W and says "I hope you don't accidently DELETE FILE!!!"
mouse is an abberationBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 10:16 pmnatural language is the ultimate input/control means. why adapt humans to oast century''s input method? qwerty typing and mice are totally hosed up. of course the features, menus of msft office bloatware will need a total redesign...better yet dump it (office 2oo7) altogether. furthermore look at cell phones - why would anyone think that inventing a dialect for texting is a good thiing? this whole area is ripe for innovation given the horsepower on these devices.
I agree....a littleBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 8:29 pmI agree with the article, but only to the extent that we won't see mice in computer embedded appliances. In those implementations a touch screen or voice activation makes sense. For workstation use though, I don't see the mouse going away any time soon. Unless a technology that provides similar accuracy and resolution of movement I'll hang onto my wireless mouse.
Slide 11By Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 6:15 pmSlide 11 is a mouse - I thought you were dead, mr. mouse?
Slide 2By Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 6:08 pmSlide 2 has a nice shiny black mouse along with touchscreen monitor - so maybe not so obsolete?
Useless ArticleBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 1:01 pmThe title speaks for itself.
Touch screen failed at our workplaceBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 12:52 pmWe had a touch screen for any HR documents at a kiosk. We used it also for punching in and out. The very definition of nine steps back, because you are using one finger vs. ten fingers to type on a key baod. Then comes the drag and drop temper-testing process. Then comes the 'eeww, gross' nose-thumbing hygiene delimma. Then comes the strengh-of-touch learning curve, which starts every time you come to work. Then comes the 'down time' or 'site-not-found' after you click, and connectivity issues. Then comes the 'they do not trust us enough any more' issues. It wasn't long before a good old mouse, keyboard, and big fat cathode glass screen replaced this thin plastic touch screen for service, and a regular Kronos with a badge swipe that generates one beep for a correct bunch and three short beeps so you 'de repeat it. I can assure you that there are 700+ people in my work place that have an extremly strong opnion against touch screen technology for life.
touch screenBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 12:13 pmFrankly, having to touch my screen all day long as a replacement to a mouse makes my shoulders ache just thinking about it. But to put a screen closer to make it more ergonomically palatable, would impact the viewing angle. It seems to me that the mouse is the perfect compromise between the eye/neck positioning requirements and the hand/arm requirements.
Good points all By Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 4:26 pmI don't know why I found this press release so irritating but I did. What do these people think we're using computers for, anyway? To play Tetris? At work I'm doing a lot of typing, on a dropped keyboard tray to try to avoid repetitive motion injury; I don't want to move my hand up a good 12 inches "click" or highlight some text. Even at home, I'm typing more than you'd think as I Google or compose email. Voice is, of course, ridiculous for the workplace and for the home too, really.
mouse aint goin nowhereBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 12:05 pmtwo minutes of your kids dirty fingers and you will pay anything for a mouse
ever use a spreadsheet wtihout a mouse?By Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 11:40 amIt is so annoying trying to point and drag using a finger.....plus trying to key in new formula's around the spreadsheet. This techologoies have place, but not as a replacement.
Could Replace the mouseBy Anonymous on May 5, 2009, 8:55 amOf all of the things that COULD happen, how many DO? The technology has existed for 20 years to replace the keyboard. We have known since before the computer era that the QWERTY keyboard was ACTUALLY DELIBERATELY DESIGNED TO SLOW YOU DOWN!!!! But it is so deeply entrenched in the culture that we're basically stuck with it!! After 25 years, and whole generations being raised on the mouse, we're stuck with it two!! After all, COBOL has not gone away!!
testBy Anonymous on May 4, 2009, 2:41 pmtest
Add a new comment