The original hacker stereotype is a smart, lonely deviant - a teenage or adult male who's long on computer smarts but short
on social skills. But like most stereotypes, it doesn't begin to tell the whole story.
Some computer criminals are techie mavericks who take pleasure in writing and releasing destructive viruses. Others are suit-wearing professionals who steal copies of their employers' customer databases to take with them when they
quit. Some are con artists with plans to scam personal information from consumers and use it for financial gain.
Main index: Profiling cybercrime: Network threats and defense strategies
Experts agree knowing more about the different skills, personality traits and methods of operation of computer criminals could
help the folks pursuing these criminals. But a lack of information hinders efforts to create substantive, reliable profiles
of the people behind today's computer crimes.
"Like in traditional crimes, it's important to try to understand what motivates these people to get involved in computer crimes
in the first place, how they choose their targets and what keeps them in this deviant behavior after the first initial thrill,"
says Marcus Rogers, an associate professor at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., where he heads cyberforensics research
in the university's department of computer technology.
Rogers' expertise spans technology and behavioral sciences. He has identified eight types of cybercriminals, ranging from
"newbies" with limited programming skills who rely on pre-written scripts to conduct their attacks, to well-trained professional
criminals and cyberterrorists with state-of-the-art gear (see graphic, below).
In addition to skill, these criminals differ in their motivations. Some computer criminals are motivated by status or money,
others by revenge, says Rogers, who worked as a detective in a computer crimes unit in Canada and earned his doctorate in
forensic psychology at the University of Manitoba.
"The kid who's running pre-written scripts, his motivation is not to collapse the American economy. He's usually driven by
experimentation, looking for a thrill. It's like cyberjoyriding." Whereas for a professional criminal, the motivation is income,
Rogers says. "He doesn't want to brag or be all over the press. He wants to be very quiet and fly under the radar as long
as possible."
One man’s hacker taxonomy Marcus Rogers has identified eight types of cyber-criminals, distinguished by their skill levels and motivations. Rogers is
an associate professor at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., where he heads cyberforensics research in the university's
department of computer technology. |
| Novice |
| • |
Limited computer and programming skills. |
| • |
Rely on toolkits to conduct their attacks. |
| • |
Can cause extensive damage to systems since they don't understand how the attack works. |
| • |
Looking for media attention. |
| Cyber-punks |
| • |
Capable of writing their own software. |
| • |
Have an understanding of the systems they are attacking. |
| • |
Many are engaged in credit card number theft and telecommunications fraud. |
| • |
Have a tendency to brag about their exploits. |
| Internals |
| a) Disgruntled employees or ex-employees |
| • |
May be involved in technology-related jobs. |
| • |
Aided by privileges they have or had been assigned as part of their job function. |
| • |
Pose largest security problem. |
| b) Petty thieves |
| • |
Include employees, contractors, consultants . |
| • |
Computer literate. |
| • |
Opportunistic: take advantage of poor internal security. |
| • |
Motivated by greed or necessity to pay off other habits, such as drugs or gambling. |
|
| Coders |
| • |
Act as mentors to the newbies. Write the scripts and automated tools that others use. |
| • |
Motivated by a sense of power and prestige. |
| • |
Dangerous — have hidden agendas, use Trojan horses. |
| Old guard hackers |
| • |
Appear to have no criminal intent. |
| • |
Alarming disrespect for personal property. |
| • |
Appear to be interested in the intellectual endeavor. |
| Professional criminals |
| • |
Specialize in corporate espionage. |
| • |
Guns for hire. |
| • |
Highly motivated, highly trained, have access to state-of-the-art equipment. |
| Information warriors/cyber-terrorists |
| • |
Increase in activity since the fall of many Eastern Bloc intelligence agencies. |
| • |
Well funded. |
| • |
Mix political rhetoric with criminal activity.Political activist |
| • |
Possible emerging category. |
| • |
Engage in hacktivism. |
|
|
Companies aren't going to solve computer security issues just by throwing technology at the problem, agrees Steven Branigan, president of security company CyanLine and author
of High-Tech Crimes Revealed: Cyberwar Stories from the Digital Front. "It's about understating where the risks are and understanding
how people behave," he says.
Hackers are motivated to do what they do for different reasons, such as money, ego, revenge and curiosity, says Branigan,
a founding member of the New York Electronic Crimes Task Force. "My experience has been that those who get into computers
first, and then start hacking, are more motivated by curiosity," he says. "Those who have criminal tendencies to begin with,
when they learn about using computers, they then figure out how to apply that to their trade."
Some wind up being more destructive than others. Script kiddies aren't generally driven to be destructive, but they'll take
advantage of some weakness that exists in an operating system, Branigan says. Cybercriminals looking to make money aren't
bent on being destructive either, he says. "[Like] any parasite, they don't want to kill the host."
"The people I've found to be the most dangerous are the ones seeking revenge," Branigan says.
Insider criminals - those who go after things like customer and supplier databases, business pipeline information, future
product prototypes and strategic business plans - are particularly good at exploiting companies' vulnerabilities. "They have
the most access, they know how systems work, and they really know where to hit you," Branigan says.
Of course, not all experts view the hacker nation through the same discriminating lens. For Patrick Gray, there's really only
one driver that matters today: Money.
Motivations have changed dramatically in the last decade, says Gray, who is director of X-Force operations at Internet Security
Systems (ISS). X-Force is the R&D division of ISS, responsible for vulnerability and threat research.
"We've gone from five or 10 years ago, where hackers were dabbling in other people's systems to see how they were configured
and really not doing anything wrong in those systems, to now where it's become incredibly malicious. We've come a full 180
degrees."
Instead of being driven by curiosity, hackers today are driven by money. "They're trying to get anything of value that they
can market," Gray says. "The stereotypical image of the lone hacker sitting up in a loft somewhere, eating Ding Dongs, drinking
Jolt cola until it comes out of his ears, and just hacking away, is gone."
Comment