Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

How to save millions through storage optimization

By Michele Hope , Network World , 05/21/2007
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

While it's undoubtedly invaluable, technology often offers only part of the solution to storage optimization. "If you don't know how to drive and you're driving a broken car, buying a new car will not fix your problem [of not knowing how to drive a car]," says Ashish Nadkani, principal consultant with GlassHouse Technologies, an enterprise-storage consulting firm.

Although many enterprises have undertaken storage-tiering and data-classification initiatives, pinpointing exactly how much money they've saved as a result is a difficult challenge, Nadkani says. Cost-cutting efforts can be hurt when a storage array or type of RAID is not matched optimally to the application, he says.

Mark Diamond, CEO at storage consulting firm Contoural, puts the issue another way.

This isn't about buying new stuff to optimize your storage, he says. Instead, it's about determining whether the data you've created is stored in the right place. This discussion goes beyond the basic concept of using inexpensive disk to store data, and delves into how the disk is configured, especially when it comes to replication and mirroring.

"We typically see that 60% of the data is overprotected and overspent, while 10% of the data is underprotected -- and therefore not in compliance with SLAs [service-level agreements]," Diamond says. "Often, we can dramatically change the cost structure of how customers store data and their SLAs, using the same disk but just configuring it differently for each class of data."

One case in point is a recent analysis Contoural performed for a large manufacturer that used three storage tiers. After assessing the different types of data and their need for replication, the Contoural team recommended a more detailed, six-tiered storage environment (see graphic). The company's estimated savings are pegged at more than $8 million over the next three years. This includes the ability to defer further Tier 1 storage-hardware acquisitions for as long as two years.

Optimization technologies, such as virtualization and deduplication, are excellent and probably can save an organization thousands of dollars, Diamond says. But if you take the bigger picture of optimizing, not just storage but the data residing on it, "you can save millions," he says.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Explore the Ultrium Edge

The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.

Find Out More

Disk and Tape Square Off

Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization

Download this White Paper

Don't Fall for the Myths

The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.

Review this information

information examination

An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption

Read this analysis

Comments (2)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Agree on fragmentation beingBy Jon Adams on June 18, 2007, 1:13 pmAgree on fragmentation being a possible culprit. Another option, which we recomment to our clients, is PerfectDisk, as we have found it handles large drives much...

Reply | Read entire comment

Heavy fragmentation and storage optimizationBy Anonymous on June 18, 2007, 6:42 amInteresting article. Just a quick comment: when it comes to optimized operation of the storage subsystems, an often overlooked aspect is heavy file fragmentation...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed