Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close
Untitled Document
:: The life and death of a virtual machine
:: Fluid desktops :: Not your father’s VLAN
:: 10 must-have virtualization tools
::
Wanted: virtualization skills :: HOME
 
HOMEPAGE

Three caveats for desktop virtualization

Before moving to any flavor of desktop virtualization, consider these issues
By Joanne Cummings , Network World , 08/18/2008
  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Watch the network: Most desktop-virtualization tools have some kind of remote presentation protocol to reduce the hit on the network: Remote Data Protocol for VMware, Independent Computing Architecture for Citrix Systems and Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments for Qumranet. In addition, some tools, such as Pano Logic's Virtual Desktop Solution, integrate such features as WAN acceleration. Still, moving every desktop to a central server and provisioning from there is bound to bog things down a bit.

When network performance problems crop up, they can be deal-breakers, especially for centrally hosted Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) scenarios. Such was the case at the University of Maryland in College Park, says Jim Maloney, network applications manager at the school. After conducting a six-month pilot of Sun's virtual desktop software running atop VMware ESX, he didn't get network buy-in right away.

"We found that the most important thing is that if you don't own the network, you need to be talking to the network people," Maloney says. "You need to make them understand what you're going to do and what impact that will have. If you don't, you can run into trouble."

Mitchell Ashley, CEO of Converging Network and a Network World Microsoft Subnet blogger, agrees. "You have to make sure your network is capable of doing this, because it could suddenly be dealing with a huge load," he says. "What if no VoIP calls get made at 9 a.m. because all these virtual PCs are booting up?" he asks.

Brace yourself for management headaches: At the University of Maryland, the evolving desktop environment now includes Sun VDI, traditional Citrix thin clients and regular desktops -- which makes management tough. "Right now, we use three separate management consoles," Maloney says. "It's somewhat of a nightmare putting reports together for our executives on what we're using and what we're doing."

Most desktop-virtualization vendors recognize the nascent management problems and are working to address them. For example, start-up VDIworks offers a tool that lets users manage physical and virtual PCs from the same console, while Microsoft's Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MEDV) will integrate with its Virtual Machine Manager software, enabling similar capabilities. Credit Suisse, an early user of VMware VDI, built its own management software and since has spun it out as a commercial tool from a start-up called DynamicOps.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation

Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).

White paper on WLA here


A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management

Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.

Whitepaper here

2 Minutes to IT workload automation

BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.

View video here

Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload

BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.

Listen here for more info

Comments (2)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RDPBy Anonymous on August 18, 2008, 9:46 amRDP isn't a native VMware protocol as the beginning of your article suggest. It's a Microsoft protocol that's widely adopted by the industry. Microsoft does the...

Reply | Read entire comment

Management Is KeyBy Mitchell Ashley on August 18, 2008, 6:17 amManaging virtualized environments is much more difficult than creating them. And large virtual images moving around on the network probably isn't what you networking...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed