Thinking outside the storage box
Unbridled growth in data storage and the rise in Web 2.0 applications are forcing a storage rethink. Is this the end of the storage-area network as we know it?
By
Joanne Cummings
,
Network World
, 01/26/2009
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
With storage growth tracking at 60% annually, according to IDC, enterprises face a dire situation. Throwing disks at the problem
simply doesn't cut it anymore. Andrew Madejczyk, vice president of global technology operations at pre-employment screening
company Sterling Infosystems, in New York, likens the situation to an episode of "House," the popular medical drama.
Click here for tips on how to deal with your growing volumes of unstructured data
"On 'House,' there are two ways to approach a problem. You treat the symptoms, or you find out what the root cause is and
actually end the problem," Madejczyk says. "With storage, up until now, the path of least resistance was to treat the symptoms
and buy more disks" - a method that surely would ignite the ire of the show's caustic but brilliant Dr. Gregory House.

Were the doctor prone to giving praise, he'd give a call out to enterprise IT managers who are rethinking this traditional
approach to storage. He'd love that technologists are willing to go outside their comfort zones to find a solution, and he'd
thrive on the experimentation and contentiousness that surround the diagnosis.
House probably would find an ally in Casey Powell, CEO at storage vendor Xiotech. "Everybody acknowledges the problem and understands it, but nobody's solving it. As technologists, we have to step back,
look at the problem and design a different way," Powell says.
Optimizing the SAN
Today most organizations store some combination of structured, database-type and unstructured file-based data. In most cases,
they rely on storage-area network (SAN) technologies to ensure efficiencies and overall storage utilization, keeping costs down as storage needs increase.
In and of themselves, SANs aren't enough, however. Enterprises increasingly are turning to technologies that promise to provide
an even bigger bang for the buck, including these:
• Data deduplication, which helps reduce redundant copies of data so firms can shrink not only storage requirements but also
backup times. (For a status report on data deduplication products, listen to this podcast now.)
• Thin provisioning, which increases storage utilization by making storage space that has been overprovisioned for one application
available to others on an as-needed basis (see "Thin provisioning: Don't let the gotchas getcha,").
• Storage tiering, which uses data policies and rules to move noncritical data to slower, less expensive storage media and
leave expensive Tier 1 storage free to handle only the most mission-critical applications.
• Storage resource management software, which helps users track and manage storage usage and capacity trends. (Compare Storage Resource Management products.)
"In the classic SAN environment, these tools don't just provide a partial solution. They allow you to make fundamental improvements,"
says Rob Soderbery, senior vice president of Symantec's Storage and Availability Management Group. Clients that have pursued
these strategies even have been able to freeze storage spending for a year at a time, he says. "And when they get back on
the storage spending cycle, they get back on at about half the spending rate they were at before," he adds. (Get more insight
from Soderbery in this podcast, “Is storage resource management right for you?”).
Although few IT executives report such dramatic reductions in storage spending, many are pursuing such strategies.

At Sterling, for example, moving from tape- to disk-based backups via Sepaton's S2100-ES2 virtual tape library reduced the time it takes for nightly backups from 12 to just a few hours, Madejczyk says. Sepaton's deduplication technology
provides an added measure. In addition, he has virtualized more than 90% of his server environment, "reducing our footprint
immensely'" and implemented EMC thin provisioning and storage virtualization.
Still, his company's storage needs keep growing, Madejczyk says. "In this economy, Sterling is being very responsible and
careful about what we spend on," he says. "We're concentrating on the data-management part of the problem, and we're seeing
results. But it's a difficult problem to solve."
Tom Amrhein, CIO at Forrester Construction in Rockville, Md., has seen similar growth. The company keeps all data associated
with its construction projects in a project management database, so the vast majority of that stored data is structured in
nature. Regulatory and compliance issues have led to increased storage needs nonetheless.
"Most companies need to keep their tax records for seven years, and that's as long as they need to keep anything," Amrhein
says. "But tax records are our shorter-cycle data. Depending on the jurisdiction, the time we could be at fault for any construction
defect is up to 10 years - and we're required to have the same level of discovery response for a project completed nine years
ago as we would for a project that's been closed out two weeks."
Forrester Construction has cut down a bit on storage needs by keeping the most data-intensive project pieces - building drawings,
for example - on paper. "Because the scanning rate is so high and paper storage costs so low, retaining those as physical
paper is more cost-effective," Amrhein says.
The real key to keeping costs in check, however, is storage-as-a-service, Amrhein says. IT outsourcer Connectria hosts the company's main application servers, including Microsoft Exchange, SQL Server
and SharePoint; project management, finance, CRM and Citrix Systems. It handles all that storage, leaving Forrester Construction
with a predictable, flat monthly fee.
"I pay for a set amount of gigabytes of storage as part of the SLA [service-level agreement], and then I pay $1 per gig monthly
for any excess," Amrhein explains. "That includes the backup, restore and all the services around those. I'm paying $25K a
month to Connectria, plus paying for about 10GB over my SLA volume. That overage is a wash."
For the firm's unstructured data, Forrester Construction uses Iron Mountain's Connected Backup for PCs service, which automatically backs up all PCs nightly via the Internet. If
a PC is not connected to the Internet at night, the user receives a backup prompt on the next connection. (Read a Q&A with Iron Mountain Digital President John Clancy.)
"With 60% of the people out of the office, this is perfect for us," Amrhein says. "Plus, Iron Mountain helps us reduce the
data volume by using deduplication," he says. "Even for people on a job site with a wireless card or low-speed connection,
it's just a five- or 10-minute thing."
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (1)
Screwy data-growth numbers?By Beth Schultz on January 30, 2009, 9:24 amJon Toigo, a storage consultant quoted in this story, takes issue with IDC's storage growth numbers (see his blog: http://www.drunkendata.com). He says: "Generally,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments