Neglecting identity management
It's time to make the switch from passwords to two-factor authentication
By David Piscitello
,
Network World
, 08/28/2006
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Many midsized companies won’t consider identity management, because they think it is too difficult to deploy, too expensive to purchase and implement, and too complicated to administer
and maintain.
The problem is that it’s precisely when companies grow to midmarket ($150 million to $1 billion) that user accounts seem to
multiply like rabbits, and “password management” requires a disproportionate percentage of security budgets and manpower.
Postponing an investment in some form of unified account or identity management often proves to be one of the most common
— and costly — mistakes in security today.
User accounts are like mold: Left unattended, their numbers grow unabated. The number of user accounts per employee increases
because companies must expand their application mix to remain competitive, comply with regulatory guidelines, improve marketing
and merchandising, and collaborate effectively.
This is a common consequence of growth, but in my experience it rarely occurs without adding considerable user account and
authentication overhead. The reasons are easy to identify and nearly impossible to avoid: Many applications use disparate or proprietary authentication methods and databases, and finding a single authentication platform that’s supported by every application is nearly impossible.
The results are too frequently the same. Users have multiple accounts and must contend with multiple authentication procedures
and interfaces. Employee productivity and willingness to comply with password security policies deteriorate over time as frustration
sets in over having to flog through multiple authentication challenges to complete work.
IT struggles to create, maintain, archive and delete accounts at diverse authentication databases in a timely manner; for
example, before credentials can be abused by disgruntled employees or exploited by attackers. In most cases, IT spends time
helping employees with password issues that could be more productively applied to patch management and other proactive desktop-security
measures.
Comment