Is Fibre Channel dead?
iSCSI over 10G Ethernet ultimately will dethrone Fibre Channel, experts predict, so it's not too early to start planning a migration
By Barbara Darrow
,
Network World
, 10/25/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Fibre Channel is the king of enterprise storage-area-network technologies. It's fast, it can handle long distances, and it's got strong vendor support.
ISCSI, however, is the heir apparent. When it comes to new SANs, add-ons to existing systems or departmental-level installations
at large enterprises that have Fibre Channel, customers increasingly are choosing iSCSI.
Check out our survey on iSCSI SAN customer satisfaction
And when iSCSI over 10 Gigabit Ethernet comes online, the biggest remaining hurdle to adopting iSCSI storage -- its perceived slow performance -- will fall. At that
point, iSCSI will become the storage interconnection transport of choice across the enterprise.
How soon until that happens? Analysts expect support for 10G Ethernet will be built into enterprise storage arrays and servers within the next three years. This means IT executives need to start learning about iSCSI now, begin asking their storage
vendors about their iSCSI road maps and begin planning for an orderly migration to iSCSI.
There are four reasons for the ascendance of iSCSI:
Cost. An iSCSI storage solution running on familiar Ethernet infrastructure costs a fraction of a high-end Fibre Channel solution
in terms of the technology and the expertise needed to run it, IT experts say.
Staffing. Finding good Fibre Channel talent can be a challenge, and the scarcity drives up the cost. "It's hard to hire people with
Fibre Channel expertise," says Andrew Reichman, an analyst with Forrester Research.
Compliance mandates. The growing list of industry and government mandates about the handling of data -- Sarbanes-Oxley, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, credit card regulations -- is driving companies to think out their storage and archiving policies carefully. The need to
digitize documents, from simple forms to X-rays, likewise motivates companies to get their storage houses in order as inexpensively
as possible without sacrificing utility and reliability.
Virtualization. "Server virtualization is a big driver," says John Sloane, analyst with Info-Tech Research Group. Many midsize companies
that may not have invested in network storage because of cost now look to consolidate more of their Windows and x86 architecture
with VMware. "To get the best benefit from VMware [for] disaster recovery, high availability and advanced data protection,
you're really driven toward putting the virtual-machine files and data on a SAN," he says.
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comments (21)
RE: Is Fibre Channel dead?By Anonymous on March 15, 2007, 10:03 amWe want to hear from YOU! Participate in our poll and share your thoughts below. Polls - Take Our Poll Fibre Channel might be a dead end, at least for...
Reply | Read entire comment
Oh, really?By Anonymous on March 15, 2007, 12:29 pmWho the heck is Joel Snyder, and why should I believe what he says? This guy comes off sounding awfully ignorant; spouting all the benefits of iSCSI, while ignoring...
Reply | Read entire comment
FC x ISCSIBy Alberto on March 15, 2007, 1:47 pmFrom the tech point of view, FC is better than iSCSI, since it was designed as DAS from scratch. Ethernet was designed for communication for packets 1500B long at...
Reply | Read entire comment
At 1G, iscsi is "free" givenBy Anonymous on March 16, 2007, 10:06 pmAt 1G, iscsi is "free" given MS's sw initiators. I doubt that sw-only will work at 10G speeds... then the question is when will 10G HBA prices reach commodity levels?...
Reply | Read entire comment
what about the costs of the switching infrastructure?By Anonymous on March 19, 2007, 10:28 amAll the talk around the initiators and targets, what I don't see is talk around the costs of a network that compares a standard FC network and a "i-scsi" network....
Reply | Read entire comment
I think Joel needs to cutBy Darin on March 19, 2007, 10:34 am I think Joel needs to cut down his caffeine intake. He is starting to hallucinate. I love these so-called industry experts that SPEW a particular technology,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments