<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/">
<title>Andress on Security</title>
<link>http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2003-12-09T12:46:10-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.62" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003822.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003746.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003822.html">
<title>Patch Management Policy</title>
<link>http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003822.html</link>
<description>I hear a lot of debate these days on patch management – it’s a losing battle, patches break my machines, developers should write better code, etc. While I agree that all these statements are true at some level, patch management...</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mandy Andress</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2003-12-09T12:46:10-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003746.html">
<title>Introduction</title>
<link>http://www.nwfusion.com/weblogs/andress/003746.html</link>
<description>Welcome to Andress on Security! I will be using this space to provide insight, tips, and tricks that will help you improve your corporate security infrastructure. I will be discussing policies, procedures, architecture, products, tools, and scripts in a number...</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Mandy Andress</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2003-11-17T14:39:15-05:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
