Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
SP2 beta for Windows Server 2008, Vista available
Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone: Latest smartphone showdown
Wanted: A long-term data center strategy
FastSoft technology speeds downloads for Getty Images
Open source developers set out software road map for 2020
VMware expands desktop virtualization capabilities
FBI warns of holiday cyber scams
Cisco renews call for national broadband strategy
Apple antivirus advice 'big to-do about nothing'
U.S. Open used Web filtering to prevent online gambling
Google Earth used by terrorists in India attacks
Verizon trounces competition in wireless quality survey
Mumbai terrorist attacks don't deter technology companies
Google layoffs: 10,000 jobs being cut, report claims
Experts to Feds: Sign the DNS root ASAP
Applications /

The Multimedia Exchange /

Ranting about codec versions

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


Network World Fusion 05/23/03

Why is it the simplest streaming project seems to turn out the most complicated? Our marketing department asked me to make an online version of short video they shot at a recent sales meeting. The video was on DV tape making it easy to suck into my editing application and cut the thing down to just the bit they wanted. The problem came when it was time to output the minute-plus clip. I first tried to encode to the Windows Media 9 format using Sorenson Squeeze. The resulting file looked great and didn't require you to be on the LAN to view it. But, while I could view it no one else could thanks to antiquated players. Having non-techies try to download and install a new version on Media Player would be a nightmare, so I did up another version using version 8 of the Windows Media codec. That worked, but the quality just isn't as good.

Juggling the formats is always a pain. Real and Microsoft say most of the codecs are backward compatible with older players, but that's not always the case. Sure, using something like MPEG could work, but the file sizes are huge. MPEG-4 is better on the bandwidth utilization, but if the end user don't have a newer version of Real or Windows Media, chances are they're not going to have an MPEG-4 decoder installed either. For now, I guess its sacrifice some quality and go with the lowest common denominator.

Back to The Multimedia Exchange

Comments

Post a comment

Name:


E-mail address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?




NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.
* HOME    * RESEARCH CENTERS     * NEWS     * EVENTS

Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | How to Advertise
Reprints and links | Partnerships | Subscribe to NW
About Network World, Inc.

Copyright, 1994-2006 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.