Cisco $64 million poorer after second infringement trial

Found to have violated Commil patents again after trial reordered due to anti-Semitism

Cisco has been ordered by federal court to pay $64 million to a Texas company in a patent infringement case. This is after Cisco was already ordered to pay Commil USA $3.7 million, but that verdict was thrown out and a new trial ordered after Cisco attorneys made insensitive remarks about the plaintiff's religion.

Cisco was found to have infringed on Commil's patents on wireless transmission technology for setting up wireless communications between PBXes, mobile units and base stations. The patent, issued in 2002, covers a way of maintaining network connections through a series of base stations so a person with a laptop computer, mobile phone or Bluetooth-enabled device doesn't lose the signal while walking through a building, according to this story in Bloomberg.

Sounds a lot like the Mobile Link feature in Cisco's new IP phones for SMBs...

In the first trial, Commil won the suit but felt the almost $4 million award was too small. But Commil got the new trial due to Cisco attorney Otis Carroll's perceived anti-Semitic remarks during cross examination of Commil principal Jonathan David, who is Jewish. The judge ruled Carroll's remarks may have prejudiced the jury.

Cisco plans to appeal the new verdict, according to the Bloomberg story. Hopefully, it will keep the religious references to a minimum.

More from Cisco Subnet:

HP "beat the crap" out of Cisco, others

Cisco, sources reveal data center next steps

Cisco's 'Jawbreaker' seen as response to competitive pressure

Cisco grapples with transition as switches and routers lag

Cisco caught off guard by switching hit

Cisco switching transition "poorly managed and timed"

Should Cisco Sell?

FCoE: From fee to free

Cisco's alright with free FCoE

Follow all Cisco Subnet bloggers on Twitter.Jim Duffy on Twitter

Follow

 
Join the Network World communities on Facebook and LinkedIn to comment on topics that are top of mind.

Copyright © 2011 IDG Communications, Inc.

IT Salary Survey: The results are in