Wi-Fi mesh standard inches forward

* Researcher predicts shift in mesh landscape

Current Job Listings

802.11s, the nascent mesh extension to the 802.11 wireless standards suite, reached a milestone at last month’s IEEE 802.11 Task Group S meeting. The group agreed to merge two remaining technology proposals into a single joint proposal that, per the group’s meeting notes, represents “the starting point for the 802.11s standard, although much work remains.”

Wi-Fi mesh is at the heart of most of today’s municipal Wi-Fi networks. It is also used in private business networks that are prone to frequent topology changes, have unusual cabling challenges, and are transient in nature (such as construction sites and roadshow-style events). In the absence of a standard, meshes are built today using equipment with proprietary protocols - the “secret sauce” of mesh suppliers.

A final standard, like most computer networking standards, would facilitate multivendor interoperability and lower prices. It will also force today’s start-up suppliers to differentiate themselves architecturally, according to Roberta Wiggins, a mobile/wireless research fellow at the Yankee Group. Wiggins authored a report, “Myths and Realities of Wi-Fi Mesh Networking,” published in February.

To date, start-ups such as Bel-Air, Firetide, PacketHop, SkyPilot, Strix Systems and Tropos have built businesses out of providing proprietary protocol extensions to the 802.11 MAC and PHY that auto-configure paths between Wi-Fi access points in a self-configuring topology. These algorithms account for environmental conditions, such as wireless interference, in choosing paths.

Once a standard replaces these proprietary mesh algorithms - at least a year away - and with bigwigs Cisco, Motorola, and Nortel now in the mesh market, watch for market consolidation, Wiggins advises. Motorola already gobbled up start-up MeshNetworks in late 2004.

Wiggins points to some architectural characteristics to consider when selecting products:

* A modular architecture with dual-frequency, multi-radio support for scalability and for separating access, backhaul ingress and backhaul egress functions.

* A switched mesh configuration for greater capacity and QoS than a shared mesh.

* A single- vs. a dual-vendor architecture; in other words, do you need one vendor for wireless LAN access and one for mesh backhaul, or can you get the whole network from a single vendor?

The next Task Group S meeting is slotted for May, when the committee expects to discuss mesh network security.

Join the Network World communities on Facebook and LinkedIn to comment on topics that are top of mind.
Now read: Getting grounded in IoT