Yesterday, Ashlee Vance of The New York Times grabbed my attention in an article about Cisco transitioning from boring switches and routers into "peddling e-mail software, video conferencing systems, cable TV boxes - even furniture." However, what really caught my eye in that article was the following statement by RBC Capital Markets Managing Director - Mark Sue:
Perhaps Cisco's motivation to focus on new directions can be partly explained by last week's 2008 Cisco proxy statement, which revealed that over 90% of Cisco executive compensation was performance-based. There are 3 main components of this performance-based compensation: 1. Company Performance Factor (CPF) 2. Customer Satisfaction Factor (CSF) 3. Individual Performance Factor (IPF) The 2008 Cisco company performance factor (CPF) revenue target was $39.745 billion, or 13.8% growth, however revenue only grew to $39.540 billion, below target at 13.2%. Exceptionally, Chambers grew income to $11.652 billion, which at 12.9% was above the CPF target of $11.461 billion, or 11% growth. Unfortunately, yours truly believes pressure from Cisco's company performance factor (CPF) is pig-headedly forcing John Chambers into "the grass is greener somewhere else mentality," which is focusing Cisco away from its successful product mix. It is my opinion that by juggling so many balls in the air, Cisco is creating huge execution risks that will simultaneously cause Cisco's stock price to lag as investors become more and more confused about Cisco's business. Perhaps it's time for Cisco to spinoff its boring business units, giving investors the choice of which business direction to take!
Do you believe Cisco will successfully keep its eye on the ball while reinventing itself?
Visit Brad Reese on Twitter http://twitter.com/BradReese |
Cisco Resumes Cisco Network Engineer Contractors Available For Hire 2008 Cisco Salary Rates Cisco Jobs |