Contributor

Security prognostications are too easy

Opinion
Jan 11, 20093 mins

 It is never satisfying being the Nostradamus of security.  No matter how many warnings you give through your writing, presentations, and conversations you will always be in a position to say “I told you so” because security is not enabled until after the fact.

Of course if you want to continue to ignore your security people and myriad pundits you could always read the news and react after someone else gets hacked.  If only the folks at TJX had been reading the paper, or my blog, and noticed that Lowes had been attacked by a couple of kids here in Southfield Michigan. They used a Pringles can antenna to break in via wifi; the exact method used against TJX stores two years later.  TJX would be $200 million richer today if they had invested a tiny amount in reacting to the Lowes incident.

I am truly glad that the 18 year old kid in California that hacked into Twitter using a dictionary attack this past Sunday did not credit my warning published November 12, 2008 (Twitter is Doomed)

I ran a few checks on Twitter. I set up an account, squatter1, and tried some password tests.  Can I use “squatter1” as my password? Yup. Can I use “password” as my password? Yup.   As I posted before (Twitter squatting?) you can use a fake email address to sign up for a twitter account. There is no email verification.  Once you are in your account you can change your password without entering your old password. This could be a problem if you Twitter from a public kiosk or if one of your co-workers happens to be on your computer and decides to mess with you.there is no lockout for multiple tries.  This makes password guessing easy for an attacker.

The biggest issue with Twitter that they should address quickly is that

I went on to describe how a password cracking tool like Brutus could be used to run a dictionary attack against a Twitter account.  My warning to users published the day before (Twitter Apps: fun or dangerous?)   pointed out that once your password had been guessed you could face the additional risks of your other accounts being attacked.Crystal who it turns out is a Twitter employee.  The hacker then used her password “happiness” to break into the password reset utility that Twitter made available to its support team.  The Wired story that broke this news yesterday   fails to point out how this kid found that utility.  Let me guess: it was at admin.twitter.com? Just like the recent discovery by Dan Goodin, San Francisco based reporter for the  UK Register (  Politics and web security ) that the Obama team’s transition web site Change.gov exposed its administrative interface at www.change.gov/admin  Which is still there. (Hello??? Is anyone listening???  )

This scenario played out this week as a hacker ran his own tool against the Twitter account of

So, hacker cracks password, gets admin access, posts passwords to a forum, and Twitter is in the news for an embarrassing series of posts to CNN, FOX News, Obama, and Britney Spears Twitter accounts.

Twitter is scrambling to fix the issue. Great. Kudos in advance for locking out accounts after six or more failed password attempts.

A lesson learned for all social media, Web 2.0 sites, heck all web applications.  Do this stuff early. Don’t wait for a hacker to drive the lesson home with a well executed attack.

Richard Stiennon is chief research analyst at IT-Harvest, the firm he founded in 2005 to cover the 1,600 vendors that make up the IT security industry. He is the author of Surviving Cyberwar (Government Institutes, 2010) and There Will Be Cyberwar: How the Move to Network-Centric Warfighting Set the Stage for Cyberwar. He is a member of the advisory board at the Information Governance Initiative and principal of TrueBit Cyber Partners. He also serves on the R2-TAC, the technical advisory committee for the Responsible Recycling standard for e-waste.

Stiennon was chief marketing officer for Fortinet Inc. and vice president of threat research at Webroot Software. Prior to that, he was vice president of research at Gartner Inc. He has a B.S. in aerospace engineering and an M.A. in war in the modern world from King’s College, London.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of Richard Stiennon and do not necessarily represent those of IDG Communications Inc. or its parent, subsidiary or affiliated companies.

More from this author