IT Roadmap: After years ignoring network security, Harvard Business School makes it a priority

News
Mar 8, 20075 mins

Security for applications becoming more important, analyst says at IT Roadmap.

When John Arsneault arrived at Harvard Business School about five years ago, the school’s network was a hacker’s dream.

“There was absolutely no security in place from a perimeter standpoint, an application standpoint, nobody really knew what was going on. The reason for that was security was viewed as a philosophical issue vs. a technology and process issue,” Arsneault, the school’s director of network operations, said Tuesday at Network World’s IT Roadmap conference in Boston. “Prior to [my arriving] there was literally no virus software anywhere in the school, which I know sounds absurd, but it was true.”

Help desks were receiving 10 to 15 calls a day because of virus-infected computers, and denial-of-service attacks were frequent. Now it is rare for either one of those problems to occur, Arsneault said, because Harvard Business School has implemented security measures including a firewall, intrusion detection, and virus controls at multiple layers such as e-mail programs and desktops.

Before it became clear security was vitally needed, faculty members worried security measures would prevent the fostering of collaboration, an open environment and research, Arsneault said.

“What actually drove them the other way was the number of denial-of-service attacks and outages we had. Eventually that philosophical approach to security went away,” he said.

Arsneault spoke during a session titled “Application & Content Security,” in which analyst Andreas Antonopoulos warned that enterprises are barely focusing on security of applications despite the crucial data and processes stored on application servers.

As threats move higher up the seven-layer network protocol stack toward applications, security measures must also move up the stack, said Antonopoulos, senior vice president and founding partner of Nemertes Research.

“We have the crown jewels on the most vulnerable servers,” Antonopoulos said. “Threats have been moving closer and closer to the application stack. … I’m very concerned about the applications being deployed in enterprises with no consideration being given to security.”

A lax approach to security can open the door to self-replicating worms that create bogus purchase orders, or a host of other problems, the analyst said. Nemertes Research conducts in-depth interviews with enterprises to determine which security issues are receiving the most focus. Application security appeared on the list for the first time in the past year, at No. 6, while antivirus/antispam programs and spyware was the No. 1 security concern, Antonopoulos said.

Spyware has become a huge problem because many companies rely on software-as-a-service, applications that are hosted on Web sites.

“When 90% of your enterprise applications are delivered over the Web, your browser is your most important enterprise application,” Antonopoulos said.

Inside a company’s network, servers hosting applications are patched less frequently than any other type of server, he said. Also, many companies fall into the trap of buying fancy security applications instead of investing in management, training and risk assessments, he said.

Another vital area enterprises ignore is the collection of audit logs, which contain treasure troves of information on compliance, troubleshooting, imminent hardware failures and insider threats, Antonopoulos said. Fewer than 30% of companies collect audit logs from all systems, he said.

In many cases, security problems boil down to a shortage of money. The financial services industry, health care and the government typically have excellent security because they consistently spend between 6% and 8% of their IT budgets on security, far more than most organizations, Antonopoulos said.

Because networks are often accessed remotely through mobile and wireless technology, security measures today should be based on a user’s identity, rather than an IP address, he said. When anyone can get online in a Starbucks, “our perimeter has disappeared completely,” he said.

Industry-wide, 75% of attacks come from inside a network, Antonopoulos said.

At Harvard Business School, however, most attacks were coming from the outside until security measures were put in place.

“Prior to the security stuff we did, most of it came from the outside because it was so easy,” Arsneault said. “Now it’s almost entirely from the inside. … The majority of what we see are folks that bring their systems from somewhere else where it’s been compromised into our environments, plug in and then we have problems. But that’s been few and far between since we put in all these different layers of protection.”

For example, Harvard Business School forces new users to register within 24 hours of being on the network and prove they have virus controls on their computers. The school also limits bandwidth for downloading files, except in specific circumstances when extra bandwidth is needed for work-related purposes.

One of the big challenges going forward is securing the 180 or so applications that were written in-house and others that were purchased by the business school.

“The idea behind these applications is functionality,” Arsneault said. “There’s really been very little thought about how do you control that data once you have legitimate access to it. It’s a big challenge.”