Why I cringe whenever I hear someone say "it's the year of Linux gaming!" The true measure of any great gaming platform is not the number of games available. Nor is it the need to have the same games as other competing platforms (the Playstation 4 doesn’t need Mario games to be considered successful). And it really isn’t even about how many total games are sold, though that certainly helps. No sir. It is far more nebulous and subjective than any of that. The measure of a great gaming platform is if people want to use it to play games on… rather than another platform. At least on occasion. For example: The SEGA Genesis. That beautiful console sold substantially less than the Super Nintendo. But it was still an excellent console that people enjoyed playing on. Thus, a success. By that measure – and that is the only measure I can think of that makes any sense – Linux qualifies as a successful (even, great) gaming platform. (Bear with me here. This isn’t a cheerleader article. This is going somewhere. Pinky swear.) I’ve seen quite a few articles that have made the point, in one fashion or another, that Linux is becoming a viable gaming platform. Now, I’m a big advocate of Linux, and I’ve spent years in the video games industry. So these sorts of statements should get me excited… right? Yet they tend to have just the opposite effect on me. Whenever I see an article declaring something akin to “Gaming on Linux has arrived!” it immediately reminds me of the last decade (two decades, really… plus some) of that similar declaration we have all heard so many times. “Next year will be the year of Desktop Linux!” There came a point where I had heard that refrain so many times that hearing it instantly made me pessimistic, or, at the very least, compelled me to say something snarky. When I hear something like “2014 is the year for gaming on Linux” I have the same reaction. Pessimism. Snark. That simple statement, as positive as it may be, can turn even the most exciting of news into something… far less exciting. That’s when I realized we need a way to actually determine if Linux is a legitimate, successful gaming platform. Then we can simply determine if it is or isn’t, and stop making those sorts of (oddly un-compelling) declarations. After much thinking on it, I decided on the criteria I laid out at the top of this article, which I am not going to repeat now, because I am lazy. Also scroll-bar. Once I figured that out, it became clear. Linux is a solid gaming platform. It has been for a long, long time. And, in recent days, Linux has only gotten even stronger as a gaming platform. But it’s not the year of Linux gaming. That already happened a long time ago. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go play Battle for Wesnoth. Related content opinion Lunduke’s Theory of Computer Mockery — no technology is sacred The more important the technology, the more ruthlessly and brutally it will be mocked. By Bryan Lunduke Nov 06, 2017 3 mins Technology Industry analysis What is MINIX? The most popular OS in the world, thanks to Intel You might not know it, but inside your Intel system, you have an operating system running in addition to your main OS that is raising eyebrows and concerns. It's called MINNIX. By Bryan Lunduke Nov 02, 2017 3 mins Intel Linux Servers how-to Linux command line tools for working with non-Linux users If you work within a Linux terminal, working with non-Linux users can be difficult. These tools help with document compatibility and companywide instant messaging. By Bryan Lunduke Nov 01, 2017 4 mins Small and Medium Business Linux Windows feature History of computers, part 2 — TCP/IP owes a lot to Xerox PUP An interview with Robert Taylor, former manager of Xerox PARC, shows TCP/IP designs were based a lot on the PARC Universal Packet (PUP) networking protocol suite. By Bryan Lunduke Oct 23, 2017 4 mins Internet Networking Podcasts Videos Resources Events NEWSLETTERS Newsletter Promo Module Test Description for newsletter promo module. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe