Denise Dubie
Senior Editor

Coping with the costs of application migrations

Opinion
Dec 19, 20074 mins

* Application migration projects cost more than time and effort

IT managers know application migration projects require time and effort, but even the savviest IT project manager might not be aware of the costs involved.

That is according to research recently published by mValent, a maker of automated application configuration management software. The company interviewed 10 of its Fortune 500 customers to learn what it takes to complete complex application migration projects and it seems it takes more than most anticipate. It could cause many to wonder if upgrading is worth the effort.

“Key reasons to upgrade include avoidance of compliance and technical risks, business benefits and improved technology,” writes Paul Hamerman, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester Research, in a report. “Factors deterring and delaying upgrades include upgrade project costs, customizations, and business cycles and release maturity.”

MValent discovered what it calls the “most common and significant hidden costs of this time-consuming, costly and error-prone IT undertaking when looking deeper into the efforts of its customers — “two banks, three insurance companies, two retailers, a telecom company, a media company and a publisher” to be exact.

To start, the customer interviews revealed that the average migration project takes more than 20 “man-weeks” and costs on average $72,000 for labor. On top of that, total IT “direct-headcount” costs involved with application migration projects fall in the range of $500,000 and $800,000.

Aside from costs, customers also indicated challenges involved with migrating applications. Among the issues they face are high rates of change among applications in pre-production phases, mValent reports. According to the companies interviewed, such rates of change “contribute to system instability and extend troubleshooting efforts which result in scheduling delays.”

Customers also noted that projects consume more costs and effort because they require more application instances to support a new implementation. And inconsistencies in “environmental variables” also contribute to project delays, mValent’s research found. Configuration settings out of sync though out the development, QA and other pre-production phases wreak havoc on projects and cause even more delays. “Extensive analysis that wastes hours and days of IT staff time is required to diagnose and remediate the configuration setting differences that cause this issue,” mValent wrote in a press release.

MValent argues best practices automated application management can help with application upgrades. The company says its Integrity application providers automated tool to configure, maintain and updating applications.

The software captures information about infrastructure requirements for different applications and models how applications use infrastructure components such as Web, application and database servers. The captured information and models inform different IT departments how to either write an application or configure infrastructure components for optimal performance.

MValent uses software installed on a dedicated server and client software on, say, an application developer’s desktop. The client software collects information relevant to its users’ role in the application lifecycle. For example, a systems administrator, an application developer, a database administrator and a network manager could all use the client software. The data configured and collected by the client software regarding any given application from that specific perspective is then sent to the server software to be correlated and to create the models of how the application users multiple components in the infrastructure.

“Hidden costs consume IT budgets. Nowhere are those hidden costs greater than in application migration projects which involve the test, evaluation and staging of a multitude of application infrastructure components that serve as the underlying foundation for any mission-critical business application,” said Jim Hickey, Chief Marketing Officer with mValent, in a company press release. “While many companies spend between $350K and $1 million in IT salaries alone to support various migrations or upgrades throughout the year, mValent customers save 50% to 67% on these expenses. Those benefits can be applied to either the bottom line or to drive the business forward through greater IT innovation.”

Denise Dubie

Denise Dubie is a senior editor at Network World with nearly 30 years of experience writing about the tech industry. Her coverage areas include AIOps, cybersecurity, networking careers, network management, observability, SASE, SD-WAN, and how AI transforms enterprise IT. A seasoned journalist and content creator, Denise writes breaking news and in-depth features, and she delivers practical advice for IT professionals while making complex technology accessible to all. Before returning to journalism, she held senior content marketing roles at CA Technologies, Berkshire Grey, and Cisco. Denise is a trusted voice in the world of enterprise IT and networking.

More from this author