Internet Explorer required: Your comments

Opinion
Sep 19, 20055 mins

Last week’s column discussing how the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Individual Assistance Center Web site required people filing claims to use Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 6.0 generated a lot of feedback.


Forum: IE required

Read comments, jump in with your thoughts.


Reader Gary McMillian wrote that this obsession with Internet Explorer isn’t restricted to FEMA: “The [Department of Defense] insists on [Internet Explorer] to submit invoices through their new Wide Area Work Flow [WAWF] system. At some point in the future [the original deadline has passed], if you don’t use WAWF [and Internet Explorer] then you won’t be able to invoice the [Defense Department] and receive payment for work done.”

But that’s not all. McMillian continued: “To add to the insult, the group responsible for payments, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, requires [Internet Explorer] to access their invoice inquiry system.”

He agrees that legislation is required to keep the federal government from mandating use of a particular vendor’s browser. Me, I think this requirement should extend to all federal and state government departments as part of a larger strategy that makes government information and services as widely accessible as possible to Internet users.

But not all readers agreed. David Gray wrote, “I’m not a big fan of government, but as a Webmaster and developer, I have to disagree with your comments regarding government requiring [Internet Explorer]. What would you say if they postponed having a Web site to make sure it was compatible with the 10% to 15% of the other users? I’m sure you’d complain that they don’t have a Web site!”