Denise Dubie
Senior Editor

ISC2: AI raises accountability demands for cybersecurity teams

News
Jul 14, 20263 mins

AI is reshaping cybersecurity roles, with IT professionals spending more time validating outputs, managing risk, and overseeing AI decisions.

AI securing digital infrastructure, analyzing biometric authentication, monitoring threats, and managing identity protection through intelligent cybersecurity protocols. Latch
Credit: Summit Art Creations / Shutterstock

Artificial intelligence is changing how cybersecurity teams work, with security professionals spending more time validating AI-generated recommendations and deciding when to trust AI outputs, according to new research from ISC2.

The ISC2 survey of 856 cybersecurity professionals found that 65% spent more time deciding when to trust or act on AI-generated recommendations during the past year, while 63% reported spending more time reviewing or validating AI outputs. The study also found that AI-related mistakes remain common. Nearly nine in 10 respondents (89%) said they have experienced AI recommendations that led to incorrect outcomes, and 50% said human decision-makers are ultimately held accountable when those mistakes occur.

“AI is not replacing cybersecurity professionals; it is changing what the profession requires of them,” ISC2 CEO Scott Beale said in a statement. “As AI takes on more repetitive tasks, cybersecurity roles are shifting toward higher-value work, from asking the right questions to validating findings, interpreting outputs, and applying human judgment.”

The ISC2 survey also revealed that:

  • 48% said AI has reduced workplace stress.
  • 32% said it has increased stress.
  • 62% cited overreliance on AI recommendations as a top concern.
  • 61% cited undetected errors that could scale rapidly across systems as a top concern.

Many cybersecurity professionals are expected to act on AI-generated outputs without fully understanding how those outputs were produced, ISC2 found. Nearly a quarter of respondents (24%) said they are often or very often expected to act on AI-generated outputs without fully understanding how those outputs were produced. Still, respondents emphasized the importance of governance and oversight. About 80% said governance frameworks, understanding when to trust AI outputs, and knowing when to override recommendations are critical for effective AI use.

Views on AI’s effect on cybersecurity careers are mixed: More than half of respondents (56%) said AI has reduced the need for entry-level positions, but 53% said AI is creating new types of entry-level roles. Nearly half (48%) said AI has made them more optimistic about their long-term cybersecurity careers.

Despite increased AI adoption, respondents said foundational cybersecurity skills remain important. Nearly two-thirds (62%) said AI has not reduced the need for core cybersecurity skills. Respondents also cited determining when to trust AI outputs (82%), understanding when to override recommendations (80%), and establishing governance frameworks (80%) as critical factors for effective AI use.

“This evolution is not limited to entry-level roles. It changes how work is distributed across security teams, making continued investment in governance, validation practices, mentoring, and skills development essential at every level,” Beale said.

Denise Dubie

Denise Dubie is a senior editor at Network World with nearly 30 years of experience writing about the tech industry. Her coverage areas include AIOps, cybersecurity, networking careers, network management, observability, SASE, SD-WAN, and how AI transforms enterprise IT. A seasoned journalist and content creator, Denise writes breaking news and in-depth features, and she delivers practical advice for IT professionals while making complex technology accessible to all. Before returning to journalism, she held senior content marketing roles at CA Technologies, Berkshire Grey, and Cisco. Denise is a trusted voice in the world of enterprise IT and networking.

More from this author