By forcing Windows 10 on users, Microsoft has lost the tenuous trust and credibility users had in the company Credit: Julien Gong Min On the surface, Microsoft has yielded to turns in the market more rapidly. But now they’ve blown it, pushing back increased trust and credibility, perhaps years, and for an inane reason: shoving Windows 10 down user’s throats. It’s a fine operating system. It has the madness of near-malware ads now sewn into it, and damnable tracking—with no publicly vetted method of preventing adware malware. Yet it’s more stable than Windows 7, it’s nicer to use than Windows 8-something, and it’s a great price model. That is, it’s a great price model until you get to this point: allowing users to reject it, for whatever reason they want. Foisting it upon them is boorish. Citations of “quit bitching” don’t acknowledge that the current trust for Microsoft is still really tenuous. + More on Network World: + Microsoft has made a lot of effort recently to win the minds of open source advocates, save perhaps, the orthodox. They acknowledged that getting Windows 10 onto Nokia phones and eating Apple’s lunch was a bad idea. They’ve become nimble, even, and I say this hesitatingly, fleet of foot—not the aircraft carrier that takes several miles just to turn around, let alone the fuel burn needed to sustain the simple turn. Missed opportunity And so I wonder aloud: WTF? Here you had a chance to erase decades of bad design, haughty, churlish, boorish behavior, and then you ram an upgrade down users’ throats. Yes, it has better security—a huge design problem Microsoft hasn’t admitted but only patched, patched, patched for nigh a decade. Add this to the enormous insanity of Windows 8X, where a product decision was made to alter the GUI radically enough to present a gotterdammerung of no-adoption storms. Stir in an off-and-on barrage of attempts to shove the upgrade down users’ throats, timid and wary as they might be, and you’ve blown it, Microsoft. You’re not learning. Look at the amount of trust and veracity that was dashed against the rocks of Windows 7 users. Their OS actually worked for a change, and THEY DIDN’T WANT TO CHANGE. They wanted to get off the upgrade merry-go-round, wanted stability, and you gave them the total debacle called Windows 8. You skipped 9, and despite the large warmth (hugely offset by perceived privacy issues), you crammed them with messages. Leave them alone. Stop it. You’re behaving badly. Time to send a product manager to China or perhaps to the Xbox returns warehouse. Related content opinion The loss of net neutrality: Say goodbye to a free and open internet The effort to restore net neutrality advanced after the U.S. Senate voted to reinstate the rules. The motion still has a battle ahead of it, though. If it fails, you can expect these long-lasting problems to surface. By Tom Henderson May 17, 2018 10 mins Small and Medium Business Internet Mobile opinion Intel sold you out A vulnerability in Intel’s AMT could leave you open to attack By Tom Henderson May 08, 2017 5 mins Internet Security Intel Security opinion Net neutrality is net new revenue Rolling back net neutrality rules will spawn record shareholder returns and telco empires—and destroy the original concept of the internet By Tom Henderson May 03, 2017 4 mins Telecommunications Industry Internet opinion Security certificates gone wrong Some websites, including one secured by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, fail in their use of security certificates and break the chains of trust By Tom Henderson Apr 25, 2017 2 mins Internet Application Security Security Podcasts Videos Resources Events NEWSLETTERS Newsletter Promo Module Test Description for newsletter promo module. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe