Should you save money by yanking out Exchange? Probably not, test shows

Analysis
Mar 9, 20092 mins

The one-two punch of Exchange server on the back end and the Outlook e-mail client on the desktop has allowed Microsoft to snag 65% of the enterprise e-mail market. But customers who use Exchange do so at a price. With the release of Exchange 2007, that price was especially apparent. The upgrade costs, hardware requirements, and hassle factor have businesses wondering “Is Microsoft still the right answer?”

Network World tested the following six alternatives to Exchange to try and answer that question: Zimbra Collaboration Server, Kerio MailServer, Communi­-Gate Pro, MDaemon, Scalix Enterprise Edition, MailSite Fusion. The tester did fine ways where these e-mail systems outdid Exchange — particularly price/performance, Macintosh interoperability, and management of mid-sized deployments. But for the enterprise, Exchange remains the gold standard. It offers a range of features not easy to beat by its competitors.

Read the full test.Jump to the Scorecard chartExchange: Should I stay or should I go?

Also see:

Exchange alternatives: Front ends and back ends

Visit the Microsoft Subnet web site for more news, blogs, podcasts. Subscribe to all Microsoft Subnet bloggers. Sign up for the bi-weekly Microsoft newsletter. (Click on News/Microsoft News Alert.)

SSH PowerShell for the massesWe-Fi: find Wi-Fi hotspots anywhere, anytime!Windows 7 post-beta leaks – why you should worryMicrosoft secretly tests uninstall option for IE in Windows 7Six of the best gadgets from Microsoft TechFestReader’s Choice for Best Windows open source Projects Microsoft to give away one million training vouchers Follow Microsoft Subnet on Twitter