craig mathias
Principal

Spectral Analysis in the Infrastructure: Testing AirDefense’s Approach

Opinion
Jun 25, 20093 mins

Putting PHY-level analysis into the WLAN infrastructure

AirDefense sent me one of their 1U appliances and a few Model 520 sensors for possible inclusion in the Network World site survey test. While it didn’t make sense to include these products there, I did take advantage of the availability of the hardware to check out the new spectrum analysis feature in version 7.3.3-12, which was not shipping when we did the Network World spectrum analyzer test. Bottom line: this could be the start of something big.I guess everyone knows by now that I consider spectral analysis to be a key requirement for essentially every enterprise-class WLAN installation. This is the only way to debug PHY-related problems, and having a portable spectrum analyzer has saved my butt many times in diagnosing otherwise-invisible problems. Still, I’ve had on my wish list for some time the desire for spectral analysis (actually, I prefer the term spectral assurance in this context) to be part of the infrastructure, essentially in every sensor (or perhaps AP) in a given system. There’s a problem here, of course, actually several: cost, complexity, needing to scan all Wi-Fi channels, and integration. Is this part of the Wi-Fi system itself, or part of the IDS/SPS/assurance system, or something else altogether? Let’s not worry about that for the moment; let’s just agree that spectral assurance needs to be part of the infrastructure, and such a path will perhaps eventually replace handheld analyzers in larger installations.So it was exciting to get some hands-on time with AirDefense’s implementation. This is an optional feature, but it’s nicely integrated with other functionality and very easy to use. The display shows a spectrogram by frequency and time, and it’s possible to specify an “interference scan” with a longer dwell time on a smaller number of channels. Duty cycle is  continuously updated. Threshold is adjustable to eliminate distant detected but likely non-interfering sources. I used the Nuts About Nets AIRHorn to generate interference and results were as expected. Scanning is a bit slower than many of the dedicated spectrum analysis products, but the result is still very usable.The only downside is that a given sensor can be, as expected, perhaps, in spectral or IDS mode at any given moment in time, but not both. It might make sense, then, to buy a few more sensors and dedicate them to spectral analysis. Regardless, I’m very encouraged, and it’s nice to seen the idea of infrastructure-based spectral analysis validated at last. On my wish list is this type of integrated spectral analysis with the ability to localize particular sources per locally-defined rules. RTLS thus once again becomes a central element in WLAN installations. More on this next week.

craig mathias

Craig J. Mathias is a principal with Farpoint Group, an advisory firm specializing in wireless networking and mobile computing. Founded in 1991, Farpoint Group works with technology developers, manufacturers, carriers and operators, enterprises, and the financial community. Craig is an internationally-recognized industry and technology analyst, consultant, conference speaker, author, columnist, and blogger. He regularly writes for Network World, CIO.com, and TechTarget. Craig holds an Sc.B. degree in Computer Science from Brown University, and is a member of the Society of Sigma Xi and the IEEE.

More from this author